As usual, the pardon of Seville has caused a flurry of opinions. They are of all kinds. Speak to those who saw the celebration by television. is more, I think the opinion of some who have not seen or deferred. I felt that I think the bull was not perfect, but he had a multitude of virtues. Among the defects, the rapid exit of the first jab and a hint of cracked, it did not end as such because the crutch again as it became Manzanares Again, as in the late slaughter of crutch.
is said that it was brave in rods. Is false. In the second inning when horse enters Chocolate is long and intently on the horse until it is carried crews. It is true that in the first jab, which marra Chocolate, the bull is not used enough. It has been said that banderilleó in the sun. True, but there they took crews. Javier Curran entered his sensational form without giving a header provided by right and with vigor.
I understand protesting the pardon, but I do not like is that it does because some want to wear the suit or the stringency of the requirement, because they think it's best amateur go against this pardon to be in favor of it. When you are looking bull flawlessly to subtract points. It is normal to both free-thinker who tear their hair out by the pardon. I have myself not very clear, but what I am sure of is that this bull Thrown to the party provided a bullfighter named Manzanares did one of the most tremendous tasks in recent times, while causing a state of collective joy in a place that asked for her forgiveness. It is surprising that in retrospect there many detractors in the square, was most impressed with the bull and the bullfighter.
have left the fundamentalists and fundamentalist defenders of the purity of the arena, which already consider desecrated for the remains. This argument is utterly fallacious. A good supporters should cast them not understanding the chance to sing something beautiful. It is as if it was contrary to their status as experts. There are many who are happy doing only negative criticism or opposing any of the system. I admit that there are those who disagree, I admit that others are quite happy with what happened. I do not understand is that changing the reality on the condition of the bull to lend a sardine ember each. Talking tame bull in rods is a monstrosity that can only come out of twisted minds. The reality of the bull is there. The images exist. There are no objective data to indicate what you should do a bull to be pardoned. The party is a state of mind.
pardon is likely to be excessive. In some blogs I include among those who favor a pardon, a sign that can not read.
Few bullfighting bulls allowed to do as he did Wrapped. Should open a debate about the bravery, because if a charging bull seventy times a crutch, promptly, travel, humiliation, hardening and repetition is not angry, then tell me what is
on the prestige of the Arsenal to open another debate. From what I am sure that this reprieve will have consequences. This year there will be no provincial seat to run out for his pardon. Nobody wants to be less than Sevilla.
0 comments:
Post a Comment